GuidesBy featureAnyone who needs to get up to speed on a topic, market or supplier before a decision or a meeting

Getting a research brief you can trust from a strong model

For Anyone who needs to get up to speed on a topic, market or supplier before a decision or a meeting.

A capable model like Astra or Fable can pull a topic together into a readable brief and lay out the trade offs. The judgement about whether it is right, and whether to act on it, stays with you, so the brief is only as good as your checking of it.

When to use this

You need to understand a topic, a market, a competitor or a supplier well enough to make or defend a decision, and you do not have a day to read everything yourself.

Turns a broad topic into a structured brief with the main points, options and open questions
Explains an unfamiliar area in plain language and defines the terms you will hear in the room
Lays out the arguments on more than one side so you are not handed a single tidy conclusion

Workflow

State the decision behind the brief, not just the topic, so the model knows what matters
Ask for a structured brief: the key points, the options, the trade offs and the open questions
Ask it to mark which claims are well established and which are uncertain or its own inference
Take the important facts and figures and confirm each against a primary source before you rely on them
Write your own one line recommendation, because that judgement is yours to make and to own

Prompts to try

Use it, adapt it, and make it your own.

I need to make this decision: [decision]. Write me a brief that covers the key points, the main options with their trade offs, and the open questions I should still be asking. Mark clearly which claims are well established and which are uncertain, and do not present a guess as a fact. Keep it to a page.

Ask Bit to adapt it →

Human lens

You decide what the brief is actually for and what a good decision would rest on
You check the claims and figures against a real source, because a confident brief can still be wrong
You add the context the model does not have: your budget, your history, your people and your risk

What to avoid

A brief can read as complete and authoritative while missing the one fact that would change your mind
Figures, dates and quotes are exactly what a model gets wrong, so check those against a real source
The model does not know your specific situation, so its recommendation is a starting point, not the decision

Related guides

View all →

Giving a persistent agent one job without handing over the keys

Agents that run on their own cloud computer stay signed in to your tools between sessions. That persistence is the point, and it means the thing you are really configuring is access, not prompts.

Using deep research without trusting it blindly

Deep research modes read many sources and return a longer, cited answer. They are powerful for a first pass, and they still need you to check the sources and the reasoning.

Letting an assistant take multiple steps on its own

Agentic modes plan a task, take a sequence of actions such as browsing, running code or editing files, and check their own progress along the way. They can save real time on chores with several steps, and they can also wander off course, so you set the boundaries and check the outcome.

Using projects to keep AI in context, not starting over

Projects or workspaces let you gather files, instructions and past chats in one place, so the assistant carries the right context into every new conversation instead of you repeating it each time.

Tools that fit: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini · Reviewed 2026-09-05